Implementing
an Information Security Policy: Guidelines for Success
By
Daniel I. Didier
Introduction
An
information security policy enables an organization to establish
a set of rules and regulations as defined by its management
to enable compliance with applicable laws, industry regulations,
and business drivers.
Establishing an information security policy is one of the most
important components of an effective information security program.
By doing so, an organization enables the alignment of business
and technology initiatives that foster the implementation of
reasonable and cost-effective information security measures.
Unfortunately,
many organizations fail to implement an information security
policy that effectively enables business initiatives, lower risk, and
ensures the ongoing information security of
its data. Often, the task of implementing an information security
policy is in response to compliance requirements and is viewed
as an added burden that hinders productivity. As such, minimal effort, funding, and support
is assigned to the task of implementing an information security
policy.
Information Security
Policy Drivers
Some
organizations take a proactive approach to information security,
but most implementations are forced by business and compliance
requirements such as the US Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
and the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).
At
the national level, every federal agency must develop, document,
and implement an information security program as defined in
the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of 2002.
Regulations and standards to protect private intellectual property
have been developed that are specific to state and local government.
The first of its kind, the California (USA) Data Privacy Law
(California SB 1386) enacted in July of 2003 requires private
companies to disclose all security breaches that result in the
disclosure of individual’s private information. As of May of
2008, 43 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have
enacted breach notification statutes similar to SB 1386.
To comply with these mandates
an organization must define guidelines for compliance in an
information security policy.
Entities
associated with critical national infrastructure must comply
with new federal mandates designed to protect our nation. As
an example, bulk power providers must comply with the requirements
defined by the North American Electric and Reliability Council
(NERC) to establish an information security program.
As
the value and amount of electronically stored information continues
to increase and the security of our nation, its people, and
its critical infrastructure dependence on information also increases,
the need for effective information security policies will become
ever more important. If your organization has been required
to develop an information security policy as a compliance requirement
or its management has decided to so as a proactive approach
to information security management, you should take this as
an opportunity to develop an information security policy that
will meld business and information security initiatives, enable
business functions, reduce risk, and help establish cost-effective
solutions.
Developing an Information
Security Policy
An
effective information security policy is one that is designed
to support the control objectives as defined by management to
meet the critical assurance requirements of achieving business
objectives and preventing, detecting, and correcting undesired
events.
An information security policy should enable high-level business
requirements by protecting data with defined policy, controls,
standards, and procedures for configuring and managing security.
In doing so, and organization clearly establishes the guidelines
necessary to meet the needs of securing business functions as
defined by the key business stakeholders.
Policy
This critical component of the information security
policy can be thought of as the rules and regulations
set by the organization that enables compliance with applicable
law, industry regulation, and the decisions of key stakeholders.
The policy should be brief and concise so that it clearly identifies
the business requirements for the security of the information
assets. Typically, there are four key elements defined: “to
whom and what the policy applies, the need for adherence, a
general description, and consequences of nonadherence.”
The policy will be used to develop the remaining controls, standards,
and procedural components of the information security policy.
Controls
Controls are measures used to protect systems against
specific threats.
As an example, a policy might require all firewall adds, moves,
or changes to be approved; a specific control that could be
defined in the policy might state that all changes to the firewall
must be facilitated with an appropriate change request form
and approved by the information security officer.
Standards
Standards define what must be done to implement security
as defined in a particular policy. This includes descriptions
of security controls and how they apply to the corporate environment.
As an example, a policy might define the need for strong authentication
when accessing sensitive data; the resulting standard might
specify a particular brand and model of smart card that should
be used to satisfy these requirements. Standards are typically
the concern of those who must implement policies and,
as such,; do not
have to be made known to all employees. Standards must be updated
periodically as technical or regulatory changes occur.
Procedures
The largest section of the information security policy,
procedures, defines how individuals must behave when implementing
policies.
Procedures should match the accompanying standards, ensuring
that standards require specific tasks to be completed to achieve
full compliance.
As an example, a policy might require the use of encryption
when communicating over any external network; the corresponding
standard might define the use of a proprietary VPN hardware
and software solution necessary to implement that policy; and
the corresponding procedure would provide detailed step-by-step
instructions required for configuring that particular VPN solution.
Interpreting Risk
In
order to compose effective policy and cost-effective actions,
a clear understanding of the risks associated with business
functions must be established. To do this, an evaluation of
the information assets and the impact of potential threats must
be performed. Typically, this will be accomplished in the form
of a risk analysis. A risk analysis should define both the
monetary value and the intrinsic value of the organization assets.
Monetary value is calculated by interpreting the cost of any
type of impact to an asset’s data, networks or systems. Intrinsic
value is calculated by interpreting the cost of a security incident
that may affect credibility, reputation, and relationships with
key stakeholders.
Once
the value of organizational assets has been established, a risk
assessment must be performed. The assessment will enable an
organization to calculate exposure and identify if an asset
is under protected, over protected or adequately protected.
The goal of the assessment is to appropriate adequate resources
to achieve the desired level of security as defined by the information
security policy.
Policy Enforcement
A
well constructed policy takes considerable effort and can add
substantial value to an organization’s business functions and
information security program. However, without proper enforcement
mechanisms, a policy may be worth little more than the paper
it was printed on. Policy compliance reviews can be used to
document the level of compliance as required by the information
security policy and is typically performed by a group or individual
that is not responsible for implementing the standards, controls,
and procedures. In addition, vulnerability assessments can
be performed by operations personnel to pinpoint specific vulnerabilities
in the systems and applications.
Policy Resources
The
creation of a policy, especially without a preexisting document,
can be extremely difficult. Luckily, many resources exist that
provide direction, recommendations, and policy templates. Utilizing
the past experiences and efforts of experience policy writers
can greatly reduce the stress and frustration associated with
policy development and also help to ensure a better end result.
Equally important to developing a successful policy is avoidance
of common policy writing pitfalls, enablement of a cooperative
team environment, and effective use of time. Some of the resources
available to assist in the policy writing process are listed
below:
·
The SANS Security Policy Project
http://www.sans.org/resources/policies/
·
ISO/IEC 17799
http://www.iso.org/iso/support/faqs/faqs_widely_used_standards/widely_used_standards_other/information_security.htm
·
CobiT
http://www.isaca.org/Template.cfm?Section=COBIT6&Template=/TaggedPage/TaggedPageDi
splay.cfm&TPLID=55&ContentID=7981
·
NIST – Special Publications
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsSPs.html
·
CERT – Governing for Enterprise Security
http://www.cert.org/governance/
Conclusion
An
organization can maximize its investment in developing an information
security policy by understanding the breath of organizational
involvement necessary to develop, implement, and manage a successful
program. In addition, aligning business and technology initiatives
by the use of an information security policy can result in reduced
risk, increased efficiencies, and ongoing compliance. Development
of an information security policy can be greatly enhanced by
leveraging preexisting materials to avoid common pitfalls and
establish effective policies, standards, controls, and procedures.